Response to the comments of Zhang et al.(2014) on “Heavy metals and polycyclic aro-matic hydrocarbons: Pollution and ecologicalrisk assessment in street dust of Tehran”

Saeedi, Mohsen and Salmanzadeh, Mahdiyeh and Jamshidi-Zanjani, Ahmad and Li, Loretta (2014) Response to the comments of Zhang et al.(2014) on “Heavy metals and polycyclic aro-matic hydrocarbons: Pollution and ecologicalrisk assessment in street dust of Tehran”. Journal of Hazardous Materials .

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25089668

Abstract or Summary

Before the Saeedi et al. [3] publication, RI has been employed for ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in soil and dust samples in several studies [4–9]. It has also been employed by researchers after this publication [10–15]. This shows that many researchers accept the view that RI is an appropriate and useful risk assessment index for some environments other than aquatic environment such as terrestrial one. However, the issues raised by Zhang et al. [1] could have been discussed and explained in our manuscript

Item Type:Journal article
Keywords that describe the item:Heavy metals, polycyclic aro-matic hydrocarbons
Subjects:Q Science > Q Science (General)
Divisions:Schools > Centre for Science and Primary Industries
ID Code:5655
Deposited By:
Deposited On:18 Jan 2018 04:51
Last Modified:08 Feb 2018 22:35

Repository Staff Only: item control page